Deep dive into the add-on roll-up strategy of serial acquirers

Content
Alex Prokofjev
Founder RollUpEurope

Alex Prokofjev is an accomplished entrepreneur and investor with a diverse background in investment banking and corporate development. Alex transitioned from investment banking in London to working with a large corporate bank, then moved into the tech industry as Head of Corporate Development for an Estonian unicorn. His foray into entrepreneurship for acquisition was sparked by his brother Pavel's success in the roll-up space. Following a pivotal conversation with Pavel in autumn 2022, Alex joined Threecolts, growing its revenue from $7 million to $60 million. This experience led him to co-found Rollup Europe, a community for serial acquirers of tech companies, providing networking events and a blog to address the challenges of scaling through acquisitions. Alex's deep insights and practical experience make him a significant voice in the industry, focusing on building a network for serial acquirers to share knowledge and strategies.

Peter Waleczek: Hey, Alex, great to see you.

Alex Prokofjev: Hey, Peter. Good to be here.

What is a serial acquirer, what are the reasons behind roll-ups, and how is this approach different from traditional private equity or company strategies?

Peter Waleczek: Thank you for joining me today. As you know, this month we focus on add-ons and how to build platforms. When I first talked to you, I found out you have a very different and interesting perspective on this topic. So, you’ve seen quite a variety and I immediately feel your passion for that topic. Can you explain in more detail what a serial acquirer is and what are the reasons behind roll-ups? How is it different from the traditional private equity or company approach?
 

Alex Prokofjev: The way we look at the serial acquirer space, especially in our community, is that if M&A is a key driver of value creation, then you are a Serial Acquirer. We distinguish two main categories: HoldCos, which are buy-and-hold without a specific industry thesis or exit horizon, and traditional private equity style buy-and-builds within a specific ecosystem or vertical.

For example, my previous company, Threecolts, was a hybrid. We focused on buying businesses within the Amazon SaaS ecosystem, aiming to scale as a permanent equity vehicle. Anyone who acquires businesses at scale and tries to unlock value from M&A would be considered a Serial Acquirer in my opinion.

Why does it make sense to review and acquire small companies frequently to build a large group quickly, and how did you address the effort involved in due diligence, negotiation, and integration?

Peter Waleczek: Your approach is to do this on a much smaller scale and more frequently to build a big group quickly. From my experience, whether the transaction is small or large, the due diligence, negotiation, and integration efforts are almost the same. Why does it make sense to review and acquire small companies? How did you solve the issue of the effort involved?
 

Alex Prokofjev: Initially, I had the same question when I was the CFO of my previous company. Why focus on small companies when larger deals can add significant revenue quickly? In private equity, you start with a market idea and dominate it. Integrating these businesses is crucial to realize synergies.

For HoldCos or buy-and-hold, the rationale is different. Smaller businesses below $10 million, especially under $5 million, tend to trade at a discount. You can typically buy them for 4 to 8 times EBITDA. If you can scale an origination and execution machine to buy these at scale with good ROIC and some organic growth, it becomes valuable. This is almost an asset class on its own, challenging for institutional investors to access. It requires a lean, efficient team, heavily incentivized through carry, and a disciplined approach to screening and executing deals, often closing only a small percentage of opportunities.

Given the attractiveness of discounts and industrializing the acquisition process, what do you do post-acquisition: integrate the businesses or hold them within a group, and how do you realize synergies?

Peter Waleczek: So, the attractiveness lies in the discount and the potential to industrialize the acquisition process. But what about post-acquisition? Do you integrate these businesses or just hold them within a group? How do you realize synergies?
 

Alex Prokofjev: Success in scaling and consistently delivering returns involves having a clear industry thesis and being very thoughtful about centralization. There are three main functions of the corporate HQ in such HoldCos: capital allocation, flawless execution of add-ons, and culture building and hiring standards. Centralization depends on the specific market and product. For example, Visma doesn’t integrate acquisitions but has deep expertise in European payroll, while Constellation Software sets standards for working capital and values.

How do you incentivize operating management within these structures? Are the incentives salary-based or are there other mechanisms?

Peter Waleczek: How do you incentivize operating management within these structures? Is it just salary-based or are there other mechanisms?
 

Alex Prokofjev: It varies by the maturity of each HoldCo. Common mechanisms include Carry and multiple classes of shares. HoldCos often replace management of acquired companies, so incentives might be more short-term and cash-heavy, linked to specific KPIs of the portfolio company rather than equity in the HoldCo.

Why do you think now is the right time to focus on ecosystems like SAP or Amazon apps for acquisitions?

Peter Waleczek: You mentioned ecosystems like SAP or Amazon apps as interesting areas for acquisitions. Why do you think now is the right time to focus on these ecosystems?
 

Alex Prokofjev: I saw the potential during my time as a CFO of a platform play. Ecosystems like SAP, Salesforce, or Shopify have mature marketplaces with numerous small companies that big vendors won’t focus on. It’s easy to find companies in these ecosystems, there are clear synergies, and the risk of experimentation is lower when spread across multiple businesses. Successful strategies include partnerships between app aggregators and reseller aggregators, such as the Adaptavist-Appfire partnership, where 80% of Appfire’s sales come through reseller aggregators like Adaptavist.

Can you provide examples of successful roll-ups and common pitfalls?

Peter Waleczek: Can you provide examples of successful roll-ups and common pitfalls?

Alex Prokofjev: The Atlassian ecosystem is a good example. Atlassian itself grew through acquisitions and has built a robust marketplace. Successful strategies include partnerships between app aggregators and reseller aggregators. On the other hand, ecosystems with high churn, like Shopify or WordPress, pose risks. If you buy a high-churn business, replacing the founder’s efforts can be challenging, and some ecosystems use app stores to identify and replicate top-performing apps, which can be a threat.

For young talent looking for opportunities, is understanding ecosystem dynamics, the actors, risks, and nature of products or apps a good space to start?

Peter Waleczek: It’s important to understand ecosystem dynamics, the actors, risks, and the nature of the products or apps. For young talent looking for opportunities, is this a good space to start?

Alex Prokofjev: Absolutely. Entrepreneurship through acquisition is a great path, especially in Europe with its many digital small champion businesses. It’s exciting and offers a combination of operating exposure and the thrill of acquisitions. I recommend young professionals in investment banking, consultancies, or large corporates to consider joining buy-and-build firms or HoldCos to gain this unique experience.

If people want to reach out to you, what’s the best way?

Peter Waleczek: Alex, great. If people want to reach out to you, what’s the best way?

Alex Prokofjev: The best way is to sign up for our newsletter at rollupeurope.com and connect with me on LinkedIn. We try to speak to every new subscriber and welcome conversations with those interested.

Peter Waleczek: Great. That was very interesting, with a lot of good insights on roll-ups in Europe and the opportunities here. Thank you so much.

Share this article
Erhalten Sie innerhalb von zwei Werktagen eine indikative Bewertung Ihres Unternehmens.
Wir berechnen auf dieser Basis gerne einen indikativen Wert Ihres Software- oder Tech-Unternehmens. Für eine genauere Bewertung müssen wir im zweiten Schritt weitere sensible Daten erfragen, für die wir Ihnen vorab eine Vertraulichkeitsvereinbarung zukommen lassen.

*FLEX Capital ist ein Private-Equity-Buyout-Investor mit Spezialisierung auf den Softwaresektor. Wir verfügen über maßgebliche Expertise bei der Unternehmensbewertung in diesem Segment.

Get a reliable valuation of your business within 48 hours.

We are happy to calculate an indicative value of your software or tech company on this basis. For a more detailed assessment, we need to ask for further sensitive data in the second step, for which we will send you a confidentiality agreement in advance.

*FLEX Capital is a private equity buyout investor specializing in the software sector. We have significant expertise in company valuation in this segment..